US TAX DESK
Subscribe
← Back to blog
Tax Watch

Washington Takes Another Swing at the "Carried Interest" Loophole

By US TAX DESK · July 9, 2026 · 5 min read
The quick version: A new Senate bill wants to tax fund managers a lot more aggressively. It probably won't pass this year — but it tells you exactly where the fight over private equity, private credit, and real estate money is heading.

First, what even is "carried interest"?

When you put money into a private equity, private credit, or real estate fund, the people running that fund don't just charge a management fee. They also keep a slice of the profits — usually around 20%. That slice is called carried interest, or "carry."

Here's the part people argue about: even though carry is basically the managers' payment for doing their job, the tax system often treats it like an investment gain instead of a paycheck. Investment gains (long-term capital gains) get taxed at a lower rate — around 20% — while regular income can be taxed up to 37%. So fund managers can end up paying a lower tax rate on millions of dollars than a lot of salaried workers pay on their income. Critics call this the "carried interest loophole." Defenders say managers are taking real risk, so they deserve capital-gains treatment.

What's new

On April 16, 2026, Senators Ron Wyden, Sheldon Whitehouse, and Angus King introduced the Ending the Carried Interest Loophole Act (S. 3317). It would scrap the current rule (Section 1061) and replace it with a system that treats carry much more like a salary — taxed at ordinary income rates and hit with self-employment tax.

The spicy detail: managers could owe tax on their carry every year, even in years the fund hasn't actually paid them anything. The bill basically assumes they're earning a return each year and taxes them on that "deemed" amount. Congress's own scorekeeper estimates it would raise about $63.1 billion over 10 years.

Reality check: is this happening?

Not right now. The bill only has Democratic sponsors, which makes it a long shot in the current Congress.

And there's important context: just last summer, the big One Big Beautiful Bill Act (signed July 4, 2025) actually kept the favorable carried-interest treatment — despite even President Trump pushing to tax it as regular income. What it did change was the timeline: managers now generally have to hold an investment for five years (up from three) to get the low tax rate.

Why you should care (even if you're not a millionaire)

Private equity, private credit, and real estate funds are massive. They own apartment buildings, lend money to companies, and increasingly show up in regular people's retirement accounts. How these funds get taxed affects deal-making, rents, and where trillions of dollars flow. This bill is a signal that the pressure on fund managers isn't going away — so it's worth tracking, even if it stalls today.

What to watch next

Whether any Republicans sign on (that's the make-or-break for it going anywhere), and whether pieces of this idea get folded into a bigger tax package down the road. Carried interest reform has come back to Congress over and over for more than a decade — this is just the latest round.

Sources — go double-check us

Not tax advice — just a plain-English heads-up. Talk to a real tax pro before making money moves.
Next: The Section 163(j) glow-up →